Real‑Time Moderation with LLMs at Scale: Hitting 100ms Budgets

/ Prime / By

Real‑Time Moderation with LLMs at Scale: Hitting 100ms Budgets

Real‑time content moderation has evolved from simple keyword filters to sophisticated, multi‑stage systems that blend vector search, compact classifiers, and selective large language model (LLM) escalation. When your app is a live chat, social feed, or multiplayer experience, moderation must happen inside user‑perceived latency thresholds—ideally under 100ms p95—without exploding costs. This article outlines production‑ready architectures, throughput math, cost controls, caching and fallbacks, and a sample pipeline that helps teams meet strict budgets. If you need hands‑on help implementing or stress‑testing such a stack, you can reach out to our team via Teyrex.

Why 100ms Matters

In real‑time communication and interactive apps, users start noticing delays above ~100–200ms. Tail latency amplification in distributed systems means a few slow microservices can dominate end‑to‑end response time (Dean & Barroso, The Tail at Scale). Add cross‑region round‑trips and model inference, and the budget gets tight fast. Edge execution and careful pipelining are essential to stay within p95 and p99 targets while handling bursty traffic.

Modern Architecture for Sub‑100ms Moderation

A pragmatic design uses a tiered, “fast‑path first” approach: let cheap deterministic checks and small ML models decide the vast majority of cases, then escalate only ambiguous samples to more expensive LLMs.

  • Edge pre‑filter: lightweight rules/regex and blocklists/allowlists.
  • Embeddings + ANN search: retrieve policy exemplars, known bad phrases, or user‑report adjacency quickly.
  • Compact classifier: a small transformer or linear head on embeddings to score risk categories.
  • Policy engine: merges signals (rules + ML scores) to an allow/soft‑block/escalate decision.
  • Selective LLM escalation: only for uncertain cases; often under 1–5% of traffic.

For reference implementations and category definitions, see OpenAI’s moderation guidance, Meta’s Llama Guard 2, and Jigsaw Perspective API. For efficient nearest‑neighbor search, review FAISS and ScaNN.

Key Considerations

LLM moderation

LLM moderation excels at nuanced, contextual judgments (e.g., sarcasm, coded threats, cross‑message references). However, LLM calls add latency and variable cost. The pattern that scales is gating: run deterministic filters and compact models first, then escalate only edge cases to an instruction‑tuned model or safety‑tuned guardrail model. Published approaches like Llama Guard 2 and OpenAI’s moderation models show classified outcome schemas (e.g., hate, violence, self‑harm) that you can align to your policy. For live chat, consider streaming a provisional decision while the LLM runs in parallel; if the LLM reverses, soft‑delete and notify moderators. This reduces perceived latency for the vast majority of traffic.

Low latency

To hit sub‑100ms, budget the path carefully: 10–30ms for edge execution, 10–30ms for embeddings/classifier, 5–15ms for ANN lookup, and 5–10ms for policy fusion and response. Keep the LLM off the critical path. Reduce cross‑region hops; latency can jump 50–150ms on trans‑continental routes, as shown by various public measurements (for example, Cloudflare Radar). Apply timeouts and circuit breakers to cap tail latency; avoid synchronous calls to remote resources for the fast path.

Embeddings

Embeddings capture semantic similarity, enabling robust detection beyond exact matches. Compact text encoders (e.g., MiniLM, E5‑small, or SBERT variants) deliver strong performance at low cost. See the Sentence‑Transformers project and the SBERT paper. Running quantized encoders with ONNX Runtime often yields 2–3× speedups on CPU. Store vectors in an ANN index (FAISS HNSW or IVF‑PQ) to retrieve similar policy exemplars and known abusive paraphrases in a few milliseconds, even with tens of millions of entries.

Autoscaling

Workloads are bursty: a viral post or game tournament can spike traffic 10× within seconds. Employ Kubernetes Horizontal Pod Autoscaler for CPU/memory metrics and KEDA for event‑driven scaling (e.g., Kafka lag, queue depth). Prefer per‑component autoscaling: separate deployment for embeddings, classifier, vector index, rule engine, and the LLM gateway so each scales independently. Warm extra capacity before events; keep at least N+1 nodes per region to avoid cold starts.

Cost control

Costs correlate with model size, tokens processed, and escalation rate. Keep 95–99% of requests on the fast path. If you process 100M items/month and escalate 2% at $0.001 per LLM call, LLM moderation costs about $2,000/month; reduce to 1% and you halve that. Apply token budgets (truncate/normalize text), compress context (only the risky span), and use cheaper models for triage before a premium model. Batch embeddings on GPU and micro‑batch the classifier to improve throughput utilization. Cache repeated content decisions to avoid recomputation.

Content safety

Moderation policies must be both precise and transparent. Start with a taxonomy mapped to platform risk: hate and harassment, threats/violence, sexual content/minor safety, self‑harm, extremism, IP violations, scams. Tools like Perspective’s toxicity labels can be inputs, not final decisions (Perspective API). Calibrate thresholds per locale and modality (text, image, audio). Institute human‑in‑the‑loop review and appeal mechanisms, and log rationales for auditability. Safety models drift; monitor prevalence by class and retrain with fresh data.

Edge inference

Running the fast path at the edge shaves tens of milliseconds. Deploy WASM/JavaScript models or ONNX Runtime where possible. Providers like Cloudflare Workers AI, AWS Lambda@Edge, and Fastly Compute@Edge support low‑latency execution close to users. Keep models compact (e.g., ≤50–100MB) for fast cold starts; quantize to int8 or int4 if accuracy allows. For privacy, redact PII at the edge before sending anything upstream.

Caching

Caching decisions pays off because content repeats. Key by a normalized content hash (e.g., SHA‑256 of lowercased, punctuation‑stripped text) and consider near‑duplicate detection (SimHash/MinHash) to catch trivial mutations. Use short TTLs (e.g., 5–30 minutes) to balance agility with savings, and implement negative caching for violative content. Cache feature vectors and ANN results separately from final policy decisions to enable faster re‑evaluation when thresholds change.

Throughput

Throughput planning starts with simple math. If your fast path averages 20ms and each instance can handle concurrency of 20 (with timeouts and backpressure), one instance supports roughly (20 / 0.020s) ≈ 1,000 requests per second. To support 10,000 RPS with headroom, you might run 12–15 instances per stage per region. Keep an eye on tail latency at p99: even a small percentage of slow requests can breach SLAs (The Tail at Scale). Use autoscaling buffers and tune queue lengths so bursts are absorbed without timeouts.

Fallbacks

No system is perfect. Define clear fallbacks: if the classifier is unavailable, degrade to rules and embeddings. If the LLM is down or over budget, auto‑route to human review or temporary hold in high‑risk categories. Region‑level failover with stale‑while‑revalidate caches can preserve service continuity. Always return a bounded decision within 100ms (allow/soft‑block/hold), with asynchronous rechecks to upgrade or downgrade outcomes if new signals arrive.

A Sample 100ms Pipeline

  1. Edge gateway (0–10ms): normalize text, tokenize minimally, apply denylist/allowlist rules, and compute a content hash. If cached decision exists, return immediately.
  2. Embeddings service (5–15ms): batch encode with a small, quantized model (e.g., MiniLM/E5‑small). Cache vectors by content hash.
  3. ANN retrieval (5–10ms): HNSW index lookup to pull similar policy exemplars, previously flagged content, or user‑report neighbors.
  4. Compact classifier (5–15ms): tiny transformer or linear head on the embedding plus retrieved features, producing per‑label risk scores.
  5. Policy engine (2–5ms): combine signals (rules + ANN neighbors + classifier scores). If confident allow/deny, return now; update decision cache.
  6. Selective escalation (async, 100–600ms): for uncertain or high‑impact items, send a condensed prompt to a safety‑tuned LLM (e.g., Llama Guard class schema or provider moderation endpoint). Do not block the initial response; if the LLM reverses a decision, soft‑delete or flag.

Technology picks: Envoy/Nginx at the edge; ONNX Runtime for encoder; FAISS HNSW for vector search; a lightweight PyTorch/ONNX classifier; Redis for decision cache; Kafka for audit streams; Prometheus/Grafana for SLOs; and Kubernetes with HPA/KEDA for scaling. This modular design lets you update any layer independently.

Throughput and Autoscaling: Worked Example

Assume 10,000 RPS steady with peaks to 50,000 RPS, and a 100ms p95 budget for the synchronous path.

  • Edge + rules: 10ms p95, concurrency 100 per node → ~10,000 RPS per edge node.
  • Embeddings: 12ms p95 per batch of 16 → per‑instance throughput ≈ 1,333 RPS.
  • ANN lookup: 8ms p95, concurrency 50 → ~6,250 RPS per node.
  • Classifier: 10ms p95 per micro‑batch → ~1,600 RPS per instance.

To sustain 10,000 RPS with 30% headroom, provision about 10 nodes for embeddings and 8–10 for the classifier per region, plus autoscaling to 5× for peaks. Keep LLM escalation under 1–2% of traffic; queue escalations with max concurrency limits and budget caps. Use Kubernetes HPA and KEDA triggers on CPU, GPU utilization, and Kafka lag.

Cost Levers That Move the Needle

  • Keep the fast‑path hit rate above 98–99% via better classifiers and confident policy thresholds.
  • Use smaller encoders (e.g., 384‑dim vectors) and PQ‑compressed ANN indices for cheaper memory footprints.
  • Batch everything: embeddings and classifier inference; enable dynamic micro‑batching on the server.
  • Cap token counts and strip irrelevant context for LLM prompts.
  • Cache aggressively and invalidate with content hashes and timestamps.
  • Prefer long‑running containers over serverless for hot code paths to avoid cold‑start costs.

Historical Context and Lessons Learned

Early moderation relied on static keyword lists and regexes, which produced high false positives/negatives and were easy to bypass. The introduction of embeddings (e.g., SBERT) improved semantic recall, while ANN indexes enabled millisecond retrieval at web scale. Safety‑tuned LLMs and guardrails added contextual nuance and policy explainability, but they reintroduced latency and cost constraints. The modern hybrid pattern—fast statistical filters first, selective LLM escalation last—offers a practical balance between accuracy, speed, and spend.

Operational Monitoring and Reliability

  • Measure p50/p95/p99 latency per stage; alert on budget regressions.
  • Track escalation rate and LLM reversal rate; aim to minimize both through better classifiers and prompts.
  • Drift detection: monitor distribution shifts (by language, topic) and retrain on fresh incidents.
  • Canary deployments per model/version with automatic rollback on error spikes.
  • Audit logging with hashed content IDs; retain exemplars for policy reviews and regulator inquiries.

Short Case Example

A global gaming platform needed live chat moderation at p95 ≤ 100ms across North America and Europe. By pushing rules and a quantized MiniLM encoder to the edge, using FAISS HNSW for similarity checks, and deploying a tiny transformer classifier (int8) in regional clusters, they cut synchronous latency to ~45–70ms p95. Only 1.2% of messages escalated to an LLM with a 350‑token cap, costing under $0.001 per escalation. Decision caching returned results for repeated spam within 5ms. During a tournament spike (8× traffic), autoscaling via KEDA on Kafka lag stabilized the system without violating SLOs.

Where Teyrex Can Help

Building a reliable, low‑latency moderation stack is equal parts architecture, MLOps, and performance engineering. Our team has shipped high‑load, secure applications on web and mobile, and can help you design, implement, and tune a hybrid moderation pipeline tailored to your policies and traffic patterns. Explore our capabilities or get in touch:

Summary Checklist

  • Fast path: rules + embeddings + compact classifier under 100ms; LLMs only for edge cases.
  • Edge inference: quantized models with ONNX; keep models small.
  • Autoscaling: HPA + KEDA; warm capacity for predictable spikes.
  • Caching: decision and feature caches keyed by content hash; near‑duplicate detection.
  • Cost controls: cap tokens, batch, compress vectors, keep escalation rate low.
  • Reliability: timeouts, circuit breakers, regional failover, and clear fallbacks.
  • Governance: transparent taxonomy, audit logs, and human‑in‑the‑loop.

Additional Resources